Molecular Imaging for Early Cancer Diagnosis

Ikalo David Oseghale *

Department of Biochemistry, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.

Imade Omoregie

Department of Biochemistry, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.

Godwin Mmaduabuchi Ikokwu

Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Molecular imaging is quickly gaining acceptance as a technique that has the potential to enhance every aspect of cancer treatment. Oncologists use molecular imaging to characterize and measure important biomolecules and molecularly based events that are essential to the malignant state in living organisms. New molecular imaging methods have the potential to greatly improve cancer treatment's diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Novel molecular enhancers for imaging modalities including US, CT, MRI, and PET, in especially for solid tumors, may enable earlier and more precise diagnosis and staging, which are necessary for effective surgical therapy. Over the past few decades, medical imaging has grown significantly and is now a key component of clinical oncology. Molecularly tailored imaging agents are the imaging technology of the future for the treatment of cancer patients. Molecular imaging is distinct from traditional anatomical imaging in that it makes use of imaging probes to see the target molecules. By enabling earlier diagnoses, gauging early treatment response, and predicting treatment response, molecular imaging is expected to have a significant impact on oncology and personalized medicine. This review article describes the characteristics of molecular imaging methods and their capabilities of early cancer diagnosis. This review study was performed on the literature sourced from the World Health Organization (WHO) and scientific citation websites such as Google Scholar, PubMed, Researchgate and Web of Science until December 2022.

Keywords: Cancer, molecular imaging, diagnostic imaging, cancer diagnosis, characterization


How to Cite

Oseghale, Ikalo David, Imade Omoregie, and Godwin Mmaduabuchi Ikokwu. 2023. “Molecular Imaging for Early Cancer Diagnosis”. International Research Journal of Oncology 6 (1):1-8. https://journalirjo.com/index.php/IRJO/article/view/118.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rosenthal R, Blanc C, Chassot P, Demartines N, CHUV L. Bilan préopératoire en chirurgie viscérale. Revue Médicale Suisse. 2008;163:1542.

Arrowsmith JE. Preoperative investigation of the surgical patient. Surg Oxf. 2005; 23(12):447-8.

Bryson GL, Wyand A, Bragg PR. Les préoperatoires tests ne correspondent pas aux directives published and rarely modifies the line of conduct. Can J. Anesth. 2006;53(3):236-41.

Bordes J, Savoie PH, Wade K, Bonnet S, Kaiser E. Systematic pre-interventional exams: analyze the results and potential implications of 201 patients in a country with limited resources. Ann Fr Anesth Reanimation. 2014;33:A360.

National Institute for clinical excellence preoperative test: European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA [Internet]; 2021.

Available:https://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/Citation/2007/06001/National_Institute_for_clinical_excellence.33.aspx

NA. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: A report by the american society of anesthesiologists task force on preanesthesia evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(2):485-96.

Chrostek H, Flori N, Senesse P. Prise en charge nutritionnelle périopératoire en chirurgie digestive carcinologique. La Lettre de l’Hépato-‐gastroenterologue. 2013;16.

Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: Surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr Edinb Scotl. avr 2006;25(2):224-44.

Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, Fearon K, Weimann A, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on parenteral nutrition:surgery. Clin. Nutr. Edinb Scotl. 2009;28(4):378-86.

Chambrier C, Sztark F. Société Francophone de nutrition clinique et métabolisme (SFNEP), Société française d'anesthésie et réanimation (SFAR). French clinical guidelines on perioperative nutrition. Update of the 1994 consensus conference on perioperative artificial nutrition for elective surgery in adults. J. Visc. Surg. 2012;149(5):e325-336.

Benoist S, Brouquet A. Dépistage de la dénutrition. J. Chir. Viscerale. Fevr. 2015; 152:3-7.

Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K, et al. Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch. Surg. Chic Ill 1960. 2005;140(3):278-83. Discussion 284.

Veterans affairs total parenteral nutrition cooperative study group. Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 1991;325(8): 525-32.

Hébuterne X, Lemarié E, Michallet M, de Montreuil CB, Schneider SM, Goldwasser F. Prevalence of malnutrition and current use of nutrition support in patients with cancer. JPEN J. Parenter Enteral Nutr. Fevr. 2014;38(2):196-204.

Chambrier C, Sztark F. Recommendations de bonnes pratiques cliniques sur la nutrition périopératoire. Update 2010 of the 1994 consensus conference on the Nutrition artificielle périopératoire en chirurgie programmée de l'adulte. J. Chir. Viscerale. 2012;149(5):369-80.

Hébuterne X. Nutrition périopératoire en chirurgie digestive: la preuve est faite - Perioperative Nutrition in Digestive Surgery: Now Evidence-based. 2005;4.

Zeanandin G. Nutritional consequences of digestive surgery. Nutr. Clin. Metabolisme. 2012;9.